HomeTrendingMcCaskill: Democrats 'may oppose government-mandated pregnancies'

McCaskill: Democrats ‘may oppose government-mandated pregnancies’

MSNBC contributor Claire McCaskill told The Andrea Mitchell Reports on Friday that the Supreme Court has dobbs annulment of the decision Rowe vs. Wade It means “Democrats can oppose these pregnancies set by the government” in the upcoming midterm elections.

McCaskill said, “I think one thing that is very dangerous for success in politics is being an extreme person with extreme views. And what this movement did is they went for it. They did extreme things in my case and in many other countries. When it comes to inflation and gas prices, the Democrats are on the upside,” McCaskill said. they may have the wind, but the extremism is strong. They can take an extreme stance against these state-sponsored pregnancies and those with guns. I think it could work:

He added: “I think business has a role to play here. Mitch McConnell’s black money is mostly financed by corporations. They invest huge sums in these unknown PACs to elect extremist senators. They have to stop. They need to look around and honestly, what big company can get the workers they need for the states that come into my state? If they travel to a state where their daughter will be convicted of abortion if they are raped, or where, due to state law, a young couple cannot have IVF. These states will have real problems in terms of economic growth and attracting companies and workers. These companies need to wake up and stop playing red shirts with blue shirts and work with a team that isn’t extreme.

Source: Breitbart

- Advertisement -

Worldwide News, Local News in London, Tips & Tricks

- Advertisement -