With the end of the right to elect the speaker and vice president, another wave began to appear in the media about shift representatives. A wave that showed itself in opening fire on these representatives and attacking their speeches and speeches in parliamentary elections, as well as in elections of parliamentary committees where representatives lost the chairmanship of any major committee in parliament. After more than four years of adopting a discourse that opposes and motivates the incumbent in exchange for preaching “change”, reversing equations and supporting Lebanese, now the situation has changed: several channels have changed their political position in a context smells of a coup against himself, so how the balance is high in What is emerging towards the so -called forces of power. Recent elections to parliamentary committees have created further resentment against “reformers” who have lost their battles and only received an orphan on the main parliamentary committees when they entered the fields of compromise and compromise. approval as members of these committees. After attacking these representatives two weeks ago, a day after the parliamentary election, accusing them of a “parade” and “disruption of selfies and popular performances”, it yesterday continued to attack the representatives. this after the parliamentary election and asked: Whether they are “representatives of change or in favor?”. In a report presented yesterday in its newsletter, the radio station described what they did as “Donakshut battles” after they lost their presidency on major parliamentary committees and admitted them as members by acclamation. The station here accused them of entering into a game of compatibility with the authorities. The MTV attack was not the only one to focus on “two shifts”: other sites, however, underestimated the capabilities of these representatives, claiming they lost their popular base because they suffered more at a loss, and raised slogans that later became “empty talk”. These sites focus on stations where these people have raised the political bar, especially about the ouster of Nabih Berry in the parliamentary elections, and their claim to control the parliamentary game, and if Berry wins, it will be destroyed. the contract of “two changes” and their inability to impose some sort of equation on Parliament becomes apparent. Thus, offensive rhetoric against “change” representatives is rising daily in a context that once again puts us in front of the question: are these traditional and electronic platforms changing their political positions? Has the adjective benefit from “variables” stopped being stoned in the media today?