The British government is reducing the amount of foreign aid it sends through international organizations like the UN, which angers left-wing politicians and philanthropic activists.
Currently, despite recent temporary cuts, around 40 per cent of Britain’s overseas aid budget still amounts to around £11.5bn – roughly the amount spent on bursting prisons and closing courts – despite the recent temporary cuts, these cuts are “in favor of the countries”. distributed. UN”. The World Bank, the European Union and other international organizations are questionable in their spending, and sometimes, according to the BBC.
But that seems likely to change soon: the state-funded broadcaster reported that the government plans to reduce the share of foreign aid budget allocated to such organizations to “only” 25% by 2025.
“In an increasingly geopolitical world, we must use development as an integral part of our foreign policy,” said Liz Truss, whose State and Commonwealth Office now includes the former Department of International Development, which is responsible for the distribution of foreign aid.
“Attackers view the economy and development as a means of control, using patronage, investment and debt as economic coercion and political force,” he told the BBC, referring to the People’s Republic of China. making a name for himself – using development money to get concessions and influence poor countries.
“We will not copy their subversive tactics, but we will match them with our determination to offer an alternative,” said the British Foreign Secretary.
Bill Gates requests UK to cancel foreign aid cuts and ship Corona Vax overseas https://t.co/j76sc5p8IW
– Breitbart London (@BreitbartLondon) April 27, 2021
The proposal angered and regretted the Left, with Labor Party spokesperson Sarah Champion in Rotherham’s gang nest, the Left: “[s]Support for the world’s poor should not be tied to a trade deal or investment partnership.”
“The UK has rightly criticized China for this approach, so I don’t see why we would go down the same path. It is depressing and frustrating for the UK to develop such a strategy,” he told the BBC, frightened by the thought that British taxpayers could derive little benefit from the large sums of money transferred abroad at the time. – the crisis of life intensifies. house.
Citing only those who were critical of the changes, the well-known neutral broadcaster attacked him, quoting Liberal Democrat MP Layla Moran, saying that “the government’s wrong focus on ‘trade aid’ is another blow to the world’s poorest man.” as a heartless solution. ”, which means“ hurting the weakest in the world ”.
The leaders of two activist charities, Bond and Cafod, also criticized the BBC’s policy of “not prioritizing health, climate change and an open society”.
For the first, Stephanie Draper echoed the Liberal Democrats’ “aid for trade” policy line, arguing that the British decision to choose how to distribute most of their aid money was driven by shorter-term political and economic interests. Rather than trying to address the roots of global crises such as inequality, conflict and climate change that affect us all.”
On behalf of the latter, Christine Allen also complained that the UK should not “violate existing assistance obligations in the UK for the sake of narrow self-interest in business and commerce”.
Corrupt foreign officials provide aid from British foreigners to organized crime https://t.co/JnoeAcsAd4
– Breitbart London (@BreitbartLondon) November 3, 2018
Source: Breitbart
