On Sunday, conservative spokesman Mark Levin criticized the reasoning Biden used by the Justice Department and its allies to prosecute former President Donald Trump over classified documents that led to the FBI’s Mar-a-Lago raid earlier this month.
Levin went through the challenges that federal prosecutors would face if they continued down this path.
Decryption looks like this:
LEVIN: If you’re going to commit a crime, do you keep a video camera at home around the clock, seven days a week? I do not know. Is it possible? Sounds silly, right? Or do you do it in front of the Secret Service? I do not know. Sounds stupid, right?
Well, you have to believe it. my god.
We received a declaration. This is attractive. Incredible. look look
Ah, someone knows how to use a felt-tip pen and ruler, and here they are, but we have seven suggestions. Let’s see if we can figure out what’s going on.
Look at this. I’m the senior legal analyst for this show right here, and they keep babbling and they keep leaking. They want absolute privacy.
Let’s start from this point. If I’m wrong and the other side is right, then why is Hillary Clinton traveling the world freely? He should get 50 life sentences for violating the Espionage Act.
How is it that Jim Comey still travels the world freely? Same with him.
We know that Hillary has a server at home to collect information, including confidential information. This violates the espionage law. No question about it.
And when you confronted him, was his home ransacked? Do you have a job search? I don’t seem to remember anything? 30 FBI agents went to Chappaqua? I do not think so. Hey Willikers.
And I remember his lawyer, David Kendall, playing a big part in deciding what the government can and cannot see. Oh, and iPhones have hammers and whitening software and all that stuff. To let? Of course not. This is Hillary. And she’s never been president out of imagination. I mean, she doesn’t even have the protection of a president.
What about James Comey? The head of the FBI, the attorney, the former U.S. Attorney General for the Southern District must know the law, right? According to me.
Well, didn’t you bring the documents? I think he did. Some are classified. I think they are. Did he throw them? It leaked a little. my god.
Shouldn’t it also serve time? Maybe now in the same prison where girls are boys and boys are girls. But no, James is making money. On TV. He’s just great.
What’s going on here?
All media. Oh, what’s in the declaration? What’s going on here is disgusting and I can see them attacking Trump. It’s always Trump. They are not his enemies. This is not the government. No matter how much we argue that the FBI or the intelligence agencies, the Democratic Party and the media are corrupt as hell, it’s always Trump.
No matter how much we go through it, he is Trump.
Look, Trump got the documents, you should know better. Take the documents home with him.
Let me go through this very quickly.
The former president has the legal right to access all documents created, classified or otherwise, during his presidency.
A second before he got up from his seat, it was clear from his movements whether he had received the documents he had declared. Are you sure about that, Mark? I’m sure of that.
It was even discussed at length in 2017 when he passed some kind of information to the Russian Foreign Minister not because Trump was a spy, but because he thought it didn’t matter. So the ex-president cannot be prosecuted under the 1917 espionage law for this reason, and also under Section II of the Constitution. According to the article, according to the first sentence, he is the executive organ and the commander-in-chief.
His subordinates cannot say to him, “You did not fill this role.” Agencies couldn’t tell him. And therefore, it is assumed that in 2017, as now, something can be declassified from his actions, since the president acts in a certain way. At least, it’s a constitutional issue, right?
So why would the Justice Department open this sack of worms? Why do this?
Now imagine if a president or ex-president could be accused of an endless debate about whether bureaucratic procedures were followed and what impact that would have on any president’s ability to become president and do his job.
Yes, I took some notes to make sure I understood correctly.
Now, among other reasons, many of us argue that the incumbent cannot be dismissed. Obviously, Trump is here as a former president, but that brings me back to my previous point of interpreting the president’s actions after he’s gone.
Oh, some Republicans and Democrats say, “Where’s the evidence? Has it passed? Because they’re not constitutionalists. They look like former federal prosecutors, professors on both sides, politicians.
Listen to me, because it’s okay if the Justice Department is too incompetent to go as is.
Now let’s come to the ownership of the documentary, this question. Under the Presidential Records Act 1978, there is no penalty, nothing, and no coercive mechanism, nothing.
The fact is, secondly, that if the president, after leaving office, has documents or other information that he received or received within a second before leaving office, he is not subject to prosecution or punishment.
The Act provides for negotiation between the former president and the archivist about the type of information, whether it is viewed as private, the location of the information, whether it is considered confidential or declassified, namely the Presidential Records Act. It’s a process, a process.
But outside of the safes the FBI has seized, obviously millions – listen to me, millions and millions of pages created under the Trump administration are controlled by the Archivists. So there’s a lot to talk about here.
That’s the truth, and the fact that there’s been negotiations between lawyers about the boxes for a while, and voluntary access to the house of the ex-president where the FBI went, the box was found, the boxes were shown, the boxes were. They looked and said, ‘Wow, look at that. Super secret, super deceptive secret. They just didn’t get it.
They could, but that goes against the absurd claim that Trump stole government property, tampered with the archives, or had criminal intent. They negotiated.
In fact, the former president had only been out of office for 12 months when the issue of the boxes that were exposed went public in January-February. This is a very short time. Sometimes negotiations take years. Of course, there’s no reason to issue a warrant. Not if there is an immediate need to review these documents.
There are many ways to get them without resorting to a criminal process. Why is there a grand criminal jury? When was he with the Empanels? And that’s the same U.S. Attorney in Washington, who on January 6, presided over the grand jury and handled the National Archives issue with the grand jury.
suspicious? I.
The expansion of the federal grand jury in Washington is surprising. Not to mention the spies and stuff in Mar-a-Lago, according to this goddamn description. Secret FBI leak. What’s going on here?
Even if the documents are deemed to have been moved or destroyed, the FBI has the authority to remove them if necessary by a subpoena enforced by a later court order. Go there in June and say, “Holy mackerel. Check out these documents. We got this and this. Let’s go back to the judge and get another summons.” But as far as we know, they don’t need to get another subpoena or court order based on what we currently know. Why? Why? Because nothing is stopping them. Nobody stopped them.
Now, if there is real evidence that something was destroyed, and there is a real probable cause, and the government really believes that someone committed the crime, go to the real judge and ask for an arrest warrant, not the Master. But what happened here was the issuance of a general order that was clearly unconstitutional. We have an entire history of violations of the Fourth Amendment in this country that requires elaboration.
And if they know what documents they’re looking for, what language they put on the proposed warrant, and what they sign, Boss, they need to know that they’re issuing a general warrant.
This allows the government to put everything – everything in its place – within nine hours. The former First Lady’s wardrobe was searched, searched, searched. wow, we know they hid super deceptive classified documents there, right?
So it implies, at least in part, using a reason to seek information on other cases, such as Jan. It is no coincidence that the same US Attorney oversees both investigations.
Also, why was this case with such constitutional ramifications heard by the Magistrate and not by a federal judge approved by the Senate under Article III? And if there’s a sense of urgency, Attorney General Garland has a funny way of showing it. He was in no hurry to issue a warrant for a search warrant. It took him two or three weeks to find something. “What should I do? I’m chasing my family. I go after people who are against abortion. I follow state legislatures. I refuse to abide by the law at the border. I have a lot to do, sorry.” done for three days or more.
Again, this is why there is speculation about the real intentions of the government.
Now, if you think about what Hillary Clinton and Jim Comey did, and it’s not just that, they’re not presidents and they’re not ex-presidents and how they’re treated versus how they’ve been treated’. This former president was treated again. Now you can see what’s going on here. Another disgusting document trick. Really?
Because of the documents, seriously? Documents the FBI could take there without a warrant? And now you have your former federal prosecutors – I’m sick of them. They really are a dime a dozen, on cable everywhere, on all network TV: “He blatantly violated the Espionage Act. This is an obstacle. He stole the documents. Of course. They have no idea what they’re talking about.
This is an attack, an attack on Trump and his supporters, an attack on the Republican Party, an attack on our country.
Unless Hillary Clinton and Jim Comey get life sentences for what they did, right? How many espionage violations have they committed?
They don’t have the ex-president’s protection, so you know what’s really going on here.
They go for it again.
Source: Breitbart
