The future of Cristiano Ronaldo seems, these days, quite uncertain and the doubts have fueled the hope of those club fans who would like to see the Portuguese international return to the club that the Manchester United striker formed: “Is this a return to sports? ?” It is the question that echoes among Leo lovers and that has given rise to several publications on social networks in recent days.

In the image, a photograph of a White Rolls-Royce in the garage of the Sporting stadium, “in the Sporting players’ area”, and a suggestion: “Ronaldo wants to play in the Champions League and Sporting is in the Champions League”. The topic of the millionaire league was pointed out as one of the obstacles for Cristiano Ronaldo’s permanence in Manchester, but is it really true that the player was, these days, in Alvalade?

No. And who guarantees it? Cristiano Ronaldo himself. In a post on SportTV’s Instagram, where a montage of an image of the player before traveling to England and a photograph of Ronaldo in Alvalade’s current club kit was published, the so-called luxury car. Below, the description: “Athletes with more hope in the signing of Cristiano Ronaldo. A photo is circulating on social networks that they say is of the Portuguese’s car in the garage of the José Alvalade Stadium.

EITHER denial it appears shortly after, with a single word: “Falso (false, in Portuguese)”. The comment, published by the player’s official account, put an end to the controversy and, consequently, to the hope of Sporting fans. After the ‘deny’, it remains to be seen what will be the future of Cristiano Ronaldo.

Arrival with Mendes, presence of Ferguson, training, meeting and an enigmatic message: Ronaldo’s day and the chances on the table

conclusion

It is false that Cristiano Ronaldo has been at the Estádio de Alvalade these days negotiating his transfer to Sporting. After the image of a Rolls Royce in Alvalade’s garage began to circulate, along with insinuations that the player could be preparing to return home, it was the Portuguese international himself who put an end to the controversy and confirmed that the information it was fake

Thus, according to the Observer classification system, this content is:

WRONG

In the Facebook classification system this content is:

FAKE: the main content claims are factually inaccurate. This option typically matches “false” or “mostly false” ratings on fact-checking websites.

NOTE: This content was curated by The Observer as part of a fact-checking partnership with Facebook.