Freedom of a press panel at the World Economic Forum in Davos on Thursday said rumors, lies, controversy and hate speech must be suppressed by social media algorithms.
WEF panel organized in partnership with Time Featuring Kenneth Roth, head of Soros-backed Human Rights Watch, who argues that social media shouldn’t focus on banning or overt censorship, the magazine instead says it’s “a subset of society… getting more “carefully” information out to the public in the best possible way.
“Algorithms are written to increase engagement because engagement is profitable, engagement means more insight, and what’s attractive? Provocation, gossip, lies, hate speech, debate.
“I focused on what should be removed, not on overt censorship, but on what was promoted. If algorithms promote information that is inherently false or divisive because it is profitable, I think these companies should be held accountable, which is perfectly reasonable,” said Roth.
Roth’s statements are in line with earlier arguments from the globalist World Economic Forum, which previously called for the promotion of “diversity and anti-bias” on social media.
“Technologies can be designed and developed in an inclusive way by involving those affected by online hate and discrimination,” said a blog post by the WEF in April.
The report says tech companies should partner with organizations like the Anti-Defamation League (ADL), which has reportedly started working with PayPal to blacklist and track alleged extremists.
The WEF argument states, “If tech companies don’t want to continue catching up, they must move from content discovery and moderation to a holistic and proactive approach to how hate is created and spread online.”
with freedom of the press @PatChappatte, @AgnesCallamard @amnestia, @KenRoth @HRW, @cdeloire @RSF_inter, @efelsenthal @TIME, @sashavakulina @euronews #wef22 https://t.co/HMxq6GLZ80
– World Economic Forum (@wef) 26 May 2022
Roth continued to argue that social media undermines journalistic criticism by allowing “autocrats” to speak directly to the public without the filters of news editors and journalists.
While the left-wing Human Rights Watch executive acknowledged that the newsroom editors were “not perfect”, pointing out that Fox News editors “somehow allowed Tucker Carlson to talk about the substitution theory”, Roth argued that the fact-checking functions of the information media are necessary for argued. working. of democracy.
“Social media has become a way for autocrats and others to avoid journalistic responsibility. In the past, it was believed that it was necessary to go through the editor to get information,” he said.
“Social media has the disadvantage of allowing powerful institutions or governments to speak directly to people and evade efforts, as well as to glorify hidden corners of the world, no matter how well a person speaks. . to provide information responsibly. “.
While some authoritarian regimes, particularly communist China, spread propaganda accounts on Western social media, similar arguments were made on all major social media platforms about democratically elected political leaders like former President Donald Trump being censored. This is not included in the WEF commission’s alleged threats to press freedom.
Looking at journalism issues in countries such as Israel, Hungary, Egypt and the Philippines, the group also failed to notice the critical efforts of neoliberal governments in the West, such as the Biden administration’s attempt to create a Disinformation Governing Council-style State Department. Real. , even the Internet Security Act in the UK and the Digital Services Act in the European Union, both of which have been criticized for severely restricting freedom of expression.
Since Google updated its primary search in May or approximately May 5, 2020, Google search impressions and Breitbart search traffic for “Joe Biden” and other Biden-related searches have dropped to zero. Zero.https://t.co/AmmQDVj9jB
– Breitbart Technology (@BreitbartTech) 29 July 2020
Source: Breitbart
