This is the third challenge faced by the forces of “change” after entering the parliamentary session, which received a series of accusations and attacks in the media. With the re -appointment of Najib Mikati to form a government yesterday, Thursday, these forces failed to combine their votes in a scenario that was repeated three weeks ago with the re -election of Nabih Berri as Speaker of Parliament and the loss of “changers” in parliamentary elections. Thus, the canals re-fired these forces and those from the “opposition” blocs who joined them for not “achieving what they wanted”, and contributed, by dispersing them, to Mikati’s return to the position of prime minister. MTV is one of the most notorious attackers of these forces and blamed him for not giving a name agreed upon by these forces “to achieve the necessary disruption”. In its newsletter yesterday, Thursday, the radio station called the incident a “failure”, criticized the “force of change” and accused them of “being caught” meeting deadlines and failing to make a single decision to deal with system. ” I then asked him: “When will the forces of change know the historical responsibility placed on them and that the necessary changes are moving forward, not backward?” Marcel Ghanem also attacked these forces in his “The Time Has Come” program on the same channel, calling the incident a “failure”, calling for a joint force and use of opportunities to oppose the other. team ”!

In turn, lbci mocked the spread of these forces and pointed out in the preface to his news bulletin that what he called the “system of authority and honesty” could “thank his Lord morning and evening” because “the system of change and the Opposition. what has happened today is a setback and a setback that has led to the frustration of those who have advanced. ” The channel of stations began to proliferate where these forces failed to rally their ranks and impose a different equation than before. He wonders if these forces will participate in forming the government and give it credibility, or if its opposition will “spread”. The preface to his newsletter ended by asking if these forces had become a “burden” like a state, and in a desperate tone asked, “Is there still room for change?”
As for Al-Jadid, whose rhetoric seemed softer, he pointed out that these people, through their dispersal, lifted Najib Mikati “on their shoulders” and brought him to Serail.
Thus, the so -called “revolutionary” channels met again to strike the forces of “change”, deceiving the Lebanese that the change in the equations in their country happens overnight, and these forces and the those around them can bring about reform and change .. In front of us is a picture that takes us back to the time before the election, when these channels deliberately ignored the question of these forces, their nature and their contradictions. And this once again proves that it is a chaos and acts according to the saying: “The path of every man is Edo-elo!”.