HomeEntertainmentNolte: Of course Hollywood romanticized guns and shooting people

Nolte: Of course Hollywood romanticized guns and shooting people

Last week, actor Matthew McConaughey went on camera and said that millions of innocent Americans should lose their Second Amendment rights because of what someone did.

As plausible as saying I can’t drive because someone else was in an accident, but that’s McConaughey’s argument.

Naturally, since Breitbart News is Breitbart News, we mock the stupidity and wild-eyed, shameless trick of the gun control arguments.

In movies and on television, McConaughey has repeatedly praised the use of guns as a necessary solution to a problem – you shoot the guy, problem solved.

McConaughey’s hypocrisy is even worse in this regard. After two decades of romantic guns, he stood in the White House briefing room and lectured the media about the “media sensationalism” of mass shootings and shootings.

All right, give him credit. At least he understands that the media influence behavior because, of course it is. But guess who pretends not to understand? They are also known as Sulu and Wonder Woman, George Takei and Linda Carter.

After publishing an article detailing McConaughey’s romance with shooting people, Sulu and Wonder Woman directly reacted to our article by being silly.

“Yes, and I flew in an invisible plane, but I still support air traffic laws (and physics),” the 70-year-old Carter tweeted. “Do people really not understand fact and fiction?”

“Although I’m a non-violent Buddhist, I’ve used a deadly phaser on screen many times,” said Takei, 85. “What do you mean?”

After Carter saw Takeya’s tweet, “We have the same reaction as George. Great minds!”

Big brains!?

This mind together is 155 years old and the best refutation you can do is pretend to be ignorant?

When the extreme left Daily News When asked to comment on these two rocket scientists, our editor-in-chief Alex Marlow gave the correct answer:

If Mr. McConaughey is seriously concerned about gun violence, he will stop using guns in his movies. However, we would prefer that he continue to make films with or without weapons and try to raise law-abiding citizens and violating our Second Amendment rights. One more thing, we always Mr. Takei, but oh my god! -What’s the matter-Hollywood’s love of guns and violence doesn’t affect the culture?

Believe me, George Takei knows better, and he said it in writing. In his biography in 1994 in the stars He detailed (from what I’ve read) the responsibility he felt to portray Asian Americans on screen with dignity. In fact, his knowledge of the power of “fiction” to influence human behavior was so disturbing that John Wayne’s appearance in a pro-Vietnam film shattered him. bruises and green (1968). He eventually accepted the role, but still struggled with it 26 years later.

God George, if Hollywood doesn’t affect people’s behavior and beliefs and how they see the world, why so much torture?

Moreover, if movies and TV are not important, why are you responsible for how you are portrayed as an Asian man?

Takei knows best, and in 1994, George Takei pointed out that in 2022, George Takei humiliated himself with frightening lies, and laughed.

Question Number.: “Do movies and TV affect our culture and behavior?” Why isn’t this a question? Of course they do because! This is a stupid question. Of course, stories, characters, words and pictures influence human behavior. What’s your next question: “Is the water wet?”

The only serious question is: “Is freedom worth the risks that come with freedom?”

In other words: Is the comfort of a car worth the annual deaths due to cars exceeding 40,000 people? Should you let your children who are in danger of being kidnapped go out? Is owning a gun worth the risk of an accident? Is the shower worth the risk of slipping and falling? Is it worth drinking a load on the liver? Is freedom of speech worth all the terrible things people say? And finally…

Is creative freedom worth risking all the consequences of allowing people to creatively express themselves the way they want?

If you understand America, the answer to all these questions is: Definitely worth the risk! A risk-free society can only be achieved through totalitarianism. Who wants to live in bubble wrap? To live on your own terms is to be an American.

But being stupid and denying the truth about Hollywood’s impact on our culture is ridiculous, especially for two people working in the industry.

animal house (1978) changed the culture of youth for at least a decade. I know. I went to Togas parties. Rap music and videos have shattered young black and white culture, especially the way these idiots handle guns. Fight Club Create fight clubs now. Ninety years ago in the romantic comedy Clark Gable didn’t wear tank tops, and tank top sales plummeted. Seventy years ago, all of Hollywood was preparing to prepare America for World War II. Twenty years ago, all of Hollywood was gearing up for us to beat the war on terror. Forty-five years ago, John Travolta made disco a national phenomenon.

And these weirdos can’t deny that science fiction is immune to this phenomenon. Forty years ago, “Pieces of Reese” became popular as it was eaten in seconds by a lifeless animatronic puppet. MEAT

Take a look now. Do you think Hollywood has had a string of box office failures? Will it change people’s behavior? Of course not. The whole idea of ​​awakening is to use the powerful power of motion pictures to reprogram human nature.

From time immemorial, people have used stories to shape their culture. Christ specifically used stories (parables) to spread the gospel. Advertisers spend hundreds of billions of dollars each year to change our behavior. One of the first actions (after they were all disarmed) of fascists like Stalin, Castro, Mao, Mussolini and Hitler was to control the arts.

Americans have always had guns. Always. What is new is the phenomenon of mass hunting, which is directly linked to gun-fetishizing movies (since the 80s), TV and video games, and the 24/7 news culture that translates into these stories of mass shootings. becomes an incentive for any psychopath. Those who think that the massacres are worthy of national fame and the knowledge that you are confusing the world.

In my own little way, I am a part of it… as an absolutist in the First and Second Amendments, as someone who uses the public position to fight for a living, to say whatever he wants, for everyone’s right – left and right. Unlike Sulu and Wonder Woman liars they want to have as many guns as they want and I accept responsibility for any lack of such protection. But I can also justify why the alternative (tyranny) is worse.

Juicy Liars and Wonder Woman love both. They want you and me to live under the tyranny of kidnapping, while enjoying not only artistic freedom to spice up sparring with people, but also the First Amendment right to lie about the negative side of Creative freedom.

Source: Breitbart

- Advertisement -

Worldwide News, Local News in London, Tips & Tricks

- Advertisement -