“I believe it is our duty as scientists to be stewards of truth,” said NYU professor Jonathan Haidt, leaving an academic panel demanding a Diversity, Equality and Inclusion (DEI) statement.
NYU social psychologist Jonathan Haidt said he resigned from its main professional association, the Association for Personality and Social Psychology (SPSP), because, by filing an application with the DEI, he “recently asked me to violate my duty of semi-trusted integrity.”
NEW YORK, NEW YORK – MARCH 10: Ibram X. Candy visited Build on March 10, 2020 at Build Studio in New York to discuss his book Stamped: Racism, Anti-Racism and You. (Photo: Michael Loccisano/Getty Images)
Haidt explained in a recent blog post that he was “surprised to learn of the new rule” about his imminent attendance at a conference where he plans to present some of the research on the new and improved version of the Moral Foundations Inventory to colleagues. “
“To present research at the conference, all social psychologists are now required to present a statement explaining “whether and how this presentation contributes to the SPSP’s goals of justice, inclusion, and anti-racism,” said the professor.
“Our research proposal will be evaluated against the old standard of scientific value with this new standard,” he added.
Haidt further notes that “many academic studies have nothing to do with diversity, so these imperative statements compel many scientists to betray their quasi-trustful duty to truth by inventing, misrepresenting, or inventing a trivial relationship to diversity.”
“I refused to do that,” Haidt explained.
In addition, “any psychologist wishing to speak at the most important convention in our field should now say how their work advances the fight against racism,” the professor wrote.
Haidt, after reading a book by the critical race theorist Abraham H. Candy, how to be anti racistHe knew he could “no longer keep quiet”, so he wrote to SPSP head Laura King about the order that “forced us all to do something more overtly ideological.”
In his letter, Haidt explained to King why he viewed Candy’s work as “problematic” and shared the following excerpt from the aforementioned book by a critical race theorist:
“The only remedy for racial discrimination is anti-racist discrimination. The only remedy for discrimination in the past is discrimination today. The only cure for discrimination today is discrimination in the future.”
Haidt said he thinks this is “morally wrong” because we “should treat people as members of groups rather than individuals, and then treat people well or badly depending on who they belong to.” group.”
“This is the opposite of what most of us growing up in the late 20th century accept as an established moral truth,” he said.
Thus, Haidt argued, the SPSP’s mandate “presses on social psychologists—especially the young people who most need to speak at the conference—to abandon their duty to truth and show an external respect for an ideology that is not recognized by some of them. I accept it.”
“I can’t stick with an organization that changes its phone and asks its members to violate their mandate against the truth,” Haidt said. “I am increasingly questioning the wisdom of making an academic organization more openly political in its mission, especially in the midst of a fierce culture war where trust in universities has collapsed.”
You can do this and on instagram.
Source: Breitbart
